<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge dismisses GITMO case</title>
	<link>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/05/13/judge-dismisses-gitmo-case/</link>
	<description>The official Web log of Great Decisions 2007</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: War Crimes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another roadblock for 9/11 prosecutions</title>
		<link>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/05/13/judge-dismisses-gitmo-case/#comment-1350</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/05/13/judge-dismisses-gitmo-case/#comment-1350</guid>
					<description>[...] As Daniel noted a few weeks ago, one of the six defendants the prosecution had initially sought to try jointly, Mohammed al-Qhatani, has already been separated for trial purposes and some commentators conjecture it had to do with particular flaws in the evidence against him. In Al-Qhatani&#8217;s case, the presiding judge refused the charges against the man who is accused of plotting to serve as the 20th 9/11 hijacker without prejudice, so the government may refile the charges at any time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] As Daniel noted a few weeks ago, one of the six defendants the prosecution had initially sought to try jointly, Mohammed al-Qhatani, has already been separated for trial purposes and some commentators conjecture it had to do with particular flaws in the evidence against him. In Al-Qhatani&#8217;s case, the presiding judge refused the charges against the man who is accused of plotting to serve as the 20th 9/11 hijacker without prejudice, so the government may refile the charges at any time. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
