<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Theory of Righteousness; An Ethical Analysis of Atrocities and War</title>
	<link>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/05/03/the-theory-of-righteousness-an-ethical-analysis-of-atrocities-and-war/</link>
	<description>The official Web log of Great Decisions 2007</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Oliver Moore</title>
		<link>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/05/03/the-theory-of-righteousness-an-ethical-analysis-of-atrocities-and-war/#comment-727</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 03:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/05/03/the-theory-of-righteousness-an-ethical-analysis-of-atrocities-and-war/#comment-727</guid>
					<description>Thanks for linking my article.

You're right, conflict is a historical reality that's not going anywhere. Politics and philosophy should be about how to make the best of it; maximise its good effects and minimise the bad ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking my article.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, conflict is a historical reality that&#8217;s not going anywhere. Politics and philosophy should be about how to make the best of it; maximise its good effects and minimise the bad ones.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Graeber</title>
		<link>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/05/03/the-theory-of-righteousness-an-ethical-analysis-of-atrocities-and-war/#comment-65</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/05/03/the-theory-of-righteousness-an-ethical-analysis-of-atrocities-and-war/#comment-65</guid>
					<description>Wesley:
Thank you for your comments.  How do you feel people like Mugabe fit into a discussion on in-group solidarity?

Doesn't the UN revolve chairs?  I think Syria or some other contentious regime headed the human rights committee and it was a matter of hot debate at the time.  They only sit for a month, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wesley:<br />
Thank you for your comments.  How do you feel people like Mugabe fit into a discussion on in-group solidarity?</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t the UN revolve chairs?  I think Syria or some other contentious regime headed the human rights committee and it was a matter of hot debate at the time.  They only sit for a month, I think.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/05/03/the-theory-of-righteousness-an-ethical-analysis-of-atrocities-and-war/#comment-64</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/05/03/the-theory-of-righteousness-an-ethical-analysis-of-atrocities-and-war/#comment-64</guid>
					<description>I see the war criminal Mugabe gained some dubious respectability at the UN.  Zimbabwe is about to head up the UN's sustainable development committee. see:

http://economicdespair.blogspot.com/2007/05/mugabe-takes-over-un-sustainable.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the war criminal Mugabe gained some dubious respectability at the UN.  Zimbabwe is about to head up the UN&#8217;s sustainable development committee. see:</p>
<p><a href='http://economicdespair.blogspot.com/2007/05/mugabe-takes-over-un-sustainable.html' rel='nofollow'>http://economicdespair.blogspot.com/2007/05/mugabe-takes-over-un-sustainable.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
